Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Michal Schmid Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs M. Schmid

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

373

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$1.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Michal Schmid

CZE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

373

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$1.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Schmid

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Michal Schmid winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Michal Schmid was at the Netherlands F5, 16-08-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Schmid	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Netherlands F5(08-16-16)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Michal Schmid

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Schmid H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Schmid
$3,738,275	Career Prize Money	$1,325
60.83% (382-246)	Career Total W/L	55.86% (262-207)
1	Clay	0
7	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	0
43.24% (16-21)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Schmid Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.25% of points on their second serve, while Michal Schmid has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 45.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michal Schmid has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.69% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michal Schmid has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/32), with Michal Schmid winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Michal Schmid has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 14/18).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Michal Schmid has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Michal Schmid being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Michal Schmid winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Michal Schmid was at the Netherlands F5, 16-08-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.28 while Michal Schmid has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michal Schmid has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michal Schmid has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Michal Schmid Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Schmid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Schmid
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
5	Aces (Total)	1
1	Total Double Faults	3
1:10:0	Average Match Time	1:10:0
53% (27/51)	1st Serve %	57% (35/61)
81% (22/27)	1st Serve Win %	54% (19/35)
63% (15/24)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (13/26)
44% (4/9)	Break Pts Won %	40% (2/5)
48% (29/61)	Return Points Win %	27% (14/51)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka	L	2-6 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Schmid Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Czech Republic F12 (Prague) - 27-11-2017
R1 Ilija VucicI. Vucic	L	7-6(6) 6-2	Stats
Czech Republic F7 (Jablonec Nad Nisou) - 23-10-2017
R1 Marek GengelM. Gengel	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
France F21 (Forbach) - 25-09-2017
R1 Julien De CuyperJ. De	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Poland F10 (Poznan) - 21-08-2017
R1 Vladimir IvanovV. Ivanov	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Turkey F29 (Mersin) - 07-08-2017
R1 Alon EliaA. Elia	L	6-0 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Schmid Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	M. Schmid
60.83% (382/246)	YTD Win/Loss	55.86% (262/207)
57.84% (874/637)	Sets Win/Loss	55.92% (590/465)
52.97% (7595/6742)	Games Win/Loss	52.14% (5058/4642)
57.81% (74/54)	Hard Win/Loss	66.23% (51/26)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	55.29% (162/131)
64.13% (118/66)	Indoor Hard W/L	48.96% (47/49)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	66.67% (2/1)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.08
3139	Aces Total	362
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.08
2297	Total Double Faults	359
1:36:56	Average Match Time	1st Match
394.63	Average Opponent Rank	576.17
62% (25788/41885)	1st Serve %	63% (5076/8119)
72% (18493/25788)	1st Serve Win %	64% (3253/5076)
48% (7758/16100)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (1423/3043)
43% (1881/4385)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (382/834)
40% (17540/43322)	Return Points Win %	40% (3255/8059)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
48.21% (27/29)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.30% (79/75)	Main Tour W/L	50.00% (2/2)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	56.25% (36/28)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	55.86% (224/177)
62% (354/572)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (258/458)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
53% (108/205)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (64/115)
57% (117/206)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (57/126)
89% (359/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (278/236)
11% (359/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (278/41)
23% (267/62)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (191/25)